Skip to content

“No Longer Defensible”

June 25, 2013

I don’t think there is a person who is connected to the wider world somehow (e.g., internet, evening news, newspapers) who doesn’t know that the AMA declared obesity a disease this week.  Many Fat Acceptance bloggers have written about it.

In the same week that this is happening, Time Magazine posted an online article about, well, about a sort of Fat Acceptance.  Oh, they didn’t call it that, but that’s what it was.

Yes, there are certain health risks associated with having an elevated BMI, such as Type II diabetes and heart disease. More broadly, a higher BMI is associated with a greater risk of cardiometabolic abnormalities, as measured by blood pressure, triglycerides, cholesterol, glucose, insulin resistance and inflammation. Nonetheless, almost one quarter of “normal weight” people also have metabolic abnormalities, and more than half of “overweight” and almost one third of “obese” people have normal profiles, according to a 2008 study. That’s 16 million normal weight Americans who have metabolic abnormalities and 20 million obese (or 56 million overweight and obese) Americans who have no such abnormalities.

One explanation for this discrepancy is that physical fitness and/or nutrition – rather than weight per se – may be what really matters. Several studies have shown that physically fit “obese” individuals have lower incidence of heart disease and mortality from all causes than do sedentary people of “normal” weight. A recent clinical trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that adopting a Mediterranean diet reduced cardiovascular risk independent of weight loss.

Let’s read that again.  Exercise and good eating habits reduced cardiovascular risk independent of weight loss.

This is from Time.  You know, Time, with its series of  five articles it ran under the heading of “Overcoming Obesity.” Time, with pages telling us that “smaller dishes could cut childhood obesity” and that “ADHD may prime boys for obesity.”  (No, I’m not going to link to those articles, they are easy enough to Google, and I don’t want to give those articles free clicks.)

So, you know, Time having an article stating that people can be healthy (or at least have reduced cardiovascular risks) independent of weight loss?  That’s kind of epic in my book.Obesity

And then, across my Facebook feed tonight, I saw a link to this article called “The Obesity Era.” The article basically shows just how complex an issue weight and weight gain is, and how the thermodynamic module (basically, “calories in/calories out”) is too simplified a concept to address the issue.  This article systematically dismantles the idea that “a calorie is a calorie is a calorie, and if you’d just eat less and exercise more, you’d be thin and presumably healthy.” And, of course, for all the good it does, it also does the whole “we shouldn’t stop trying to forestall a major public-health menace” thing.

However, it has a lot of good things in it:

And so we appear to have a public consensus that excess body weight (defined as a Body Mass Index of 25 or above) and obesity (BMI of 30 or above) are consequences of individual choice. It is undoubtedly true that societies are spending vast amounts of time and money on this idea. It is also true that the masters of the universe in business and government seem attracted to it, perhaps because stern self-discipline is how many of them attained their status. What we don’t know is whether the theory is actually correct.

Of course, that’s not the impression you will get from the admonishments of public-health agencies and wellness businesses. They are quick to assure us that ‘science says’ obesity is caused by individual choices about food and exercise. As the Mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg, recently put it, defending his proposed ban on large cups for sugary drinks: ‘If you want to lose weight, don’t eat. This is not medicine, it’s thermodynamics. If you take in more than you use, you store it.’ (Got that? It’s not complicated medicine, it’s simple physics, the most sciencey science of all.)

Yet the scientists who study the biochemistry of fat and the epidemiologists who track weight trends are not nearly as unanimous as Bloomberg makes out. In fact, many researchers believe that personal gluttony and laziness cannot be the entire explanation for humanity’s global weight gain. Which means, of course, that they think at least some of the official focus on personal conduct is a waste of time and money. As Richard L Atkinson, Emeritus Professor of Medicine and Nutritional Sciences at the University of Wisconsin and editor of the International Journal of Obesity, put it in 2005: ‘The previous belief of many lay people and health professionals that obesity is simply the result of a lack of willpower and an inability to discipline eating habits is no longer defensible.’  (Emphasis mine.)

The quote was written in 2005.  This has been known for a while, and it has taken mass media this long to catch up.  (And yes, I know that the International Journal of Obesity is problematic, as it addresses the development and treatment of obesity.  However, that just makes the quote that much more remarkable.)

This article really states that obesity is so complex that the “cause” of it can be laid everywhere, including on the fact that we live in modern times with lights and central heating and air conditioning, as well as the chemicals we ingest every day that leaches out of our packaging, in addition to stress and lack of sleep and whether our mothers were malnourished during their pregnancy with us and …

And.  And.  And.

‘The previous belief of many lay people and health professionals that obesity is simply the result of a lack of willpower and an inability to discipline eating habits is no longer defensible.’

Honestly, it never was.  It’s about time they figured this out.

7 Comments leave one →
  1. June 25, 2013 11:38 am

    As the Australian author of Hippos Eat Grass – Busting the Fat Myth, I want to add some thought provoking facts to the mix. According to a recent article that was published in the British medical magazine Lancet, the only countries in the world with a healthy BMI are certain Asian countries where people are a naturally slim build and countries in Africa where people are starving! There is so much propaganda regarding size out there, it only serves to diminish who we were born to be. Just like animals, people are created in a variety of shapes and sizes and we each deserve respect and dignity, and recognition of how unique and beautiful we are. I was born in Greece where the Mediterranean diet originated from. Greece ranks as one of the highest on the obesity scale but it beats out most other European countries in terms of longevity. If you want to learn the real facts, they are outlined in my book. It’s time for the truth to prevail.

  2. vesta44 permalink
    June 25, 2013 1:37 pm

    Where did I see that article the other day that said even animals, wild animals, not just pets, are also getting fatter? Even the lab animals who are fed a controlled diet are getting fatter over the decades that they’ve had lab animals. These are not the lab animals that are used for experiments on getting fatter/thinner, these are the lab animals that are used in other experiments having nothing to do with weight gain/loss. Those lab animals are fed a strictly controlled diet and somehow, future generations have ended up fatter than previous generations.
    There wasn’t a specific reason given for so many animals becoming fatter, but one speculation was that our ever-changing environment could be one influence. If you stop to think about how things have changed, just over the last 50 or 60 years, it shouldn’t be surprising that not only people are getting larger (taller as well as fatter), but animals as well. Which should really put the lie to “it’s a matter of willpower”, “it’s calories in/out”, and “just eat less, move more” as ways to solve this supposed “problem” of people being “fatter than ever before in the history of man.” None of those tropes apply to animals, so if they don’t apply to animals who are getting fatter, why should they apply to humans?

  3. Dizzyd permalink
    June 26, 2013 4:03 pm

    To which fatties everywhere say ‘DUHHH!!’ I mean seriously! Then NY’s own bright boy Mayor Bloomberg coming up with the earth-shattering ‘If you want to lose weight, don’t eat.’ It’s like ‘Wow! Thanks for the news flash, Captain Brilliant!’ Is it any wonder these guys keep pounding their heads over and over with the same BMI rock? It’s like they’re so stupid that information takes forever to seep down into their little pea-brains.

  4. Dizzyd permalink
    June 26, 2013 4:11 pm

    Vesta – I wonder if the animals are getting fatter simply ‘cuz some lab-coat somewhere lowered the cutoff points at which they’re considered ‘overweight’ and ‘obese’? LOL

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: